Both by the calendar and what I
am seeing in the field, cotton harvest aid considerations are coming to the
forefront in another year. Harvest aid
decisions truly do seem more art than science with so many variables affecting
product performance and application timing.
This time of year everyone in the industry pays extra attention to the
weather forecasts and keeps an eye toward the cotton stage as we strive to take
as much of the guess work out of harvest aids as we possibly can. Producers certainly do not want to miscarry a
crop this late in the game. Consultants
and advisors must be on their toes. Applying harvest aids too early can cause
yield reduction, be harmful to fiber quality, and will damage seed weight and
quality while applying too late exposes the precious fiber to the elements
which can cause fiber degradation, and lint string and outright drop.
With that in
mind, the 2013 High Plains and Northern Rolling Plains Cotton Harvest-Aid Guide is
now available through http://lubbock.tamu.edu/. The Harvest-Aid Guide is stuffed with useful
information updated annually for the purpose of helping producers and
specialists make educated harvest aid decisions. Of particular interest to me are the latest Cotton
Harvest-Aid Decision Tables. These
tables contain the current list of locally tested and labeled harvest aid
products complete with recommended rate ranges and surfactants. For a full overview of all cotton harvest-
aid considerations, please reference the 2013 guide. There can seem to be endless factors
effecting harvest aid decisions. Here, I
would like to review the three main FIELD MEASURABLE factors influencing the
basic ‘field ready’, or ‘field not yet’ question in cotton harvest-aid
decisions.
If
there is one factor that can be (or for some odd reason must be) used alone I
would suggest evaluating the uppermost harvestable boll’s maturity. I prefer to utilize the old standard boll
maturity rating system of 1 through 3. To
evaluate the maturity of a cotton boll, use a sharp knife to cut into the boll
somewhere between the upper half and upper third. If the boll is watery or jelly-like on the
inside, then it is immature and needs more heat units. This boll can be rated as a maturity 1. If limited or no additional heat units are
available from the environment, that boll can likely be considered as not
harvestable, and another boll farther down the plant needs to be evaluated. If boll development is such that the knife
cannot slice through the lint easily, then the boll is nearly mature. Close inspection of the seed will give further
indication of boll maturity. If the seed
coat is turning tan and the seed leaves (or cotyledons) are fully developed,
the boll is nearing maturity. This boll
could be rated as a maturity 3. In
between these two ratings is a maturity 2.
Fields that have an average boll maturity rating of 2.4 can be
considered ready for harvest aids. We
need only evaluate enough bolls to be confident in the average rating for that
field that day.
A
second factor is the NACB (nodes above cracked boll) stage of the field. For those who are accustomed to making in
season NAWF (nodes above white flower) evaluations, this evaluation is very
similar with one difference. In place of
counting nodes from white flower to uppermost unfurled leaf, we count from
uppermost cracked open boll to uppermost harvestable boll. When the cotton field averages 4 NACB, the
field is likely ready for harvest aids.
The
third factor is percent open boll. This
is likely the easiest factor to understand, but requires the most effort to
obtain. I prefer to measure 10 row feet
from several locations within the field, counting the number of open bolls over
the total number of bolls within all 10 foot areas to obtain an accurate
percent open boll count for the field (percent open boll = # open bolls / # total bolls). Once a field reaches 60% open boll, then it
can be considered ready for all harvest aids, except for pure desiccants which
requires a 90% open boll count and is only really utilized in dry-land
situations. Taking the percent open boll
counts does take more effort but once we have taken the 10 row feet counts,
other useful knowledge can be gleamed from the information such as yield
estimates and field variability.
Ideally we should utilize and combine all
three of these field measurable factors to help put as much science into our
harvest aid art as possible. This data,
gathered correctly, should then be considered along with many, many other factors,
such as expected two week temperature, available sunshine, night time
temperature, leaf drop, plant moisture content, expected freeze date,… just to
name a few .
Please call or come by with any
questions,
Blayne
No comments:
Post a Comment